Monday 18 February 2013

MEN Jumps on the Chip Pan Fire Bandwagon

Following the success of Choughworld's campaign against Chip Pan Fires, the rival rag has suddenly 'discovered' the issue itself.

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/firefighters-been-prompted-restate-fire-safety-1327388

While we appreciate the support that a paper which targets those most likely to cause chip pan fires (drunks and imbeciles) it would be nice for them to credit where they get their stories from. 

It's just an odd coincidence that I set up Choughworld's Twitter service on Saturday, and by Monday they are running stories surprisingly similar to ours.  Here at Choughworld we always acknowledge Twitter as our source of all news and Wikipedia as the source of all facts.  Perhap MEN could be big enough to do the same?

As National Chip Pan Fire week continues, we will be monitoring the MEN and our legal department is poised to issue injunctions against any infringements of our copyright.

Are YOU an MEN hack, barely sober enough to string a few words together?  Comment NOW.
Posted by at
Labels: ,
Location: Manchester, UK

9 comments:

  1. interested18 February 2013 at 15:39

    Did you get sacked from the MEN?
    Just wondering why your so bitter...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Curious18 February 2013 at 19:13

      You think this is bitter? Have you been on the internet before?

      Delete
  2. Unknown18 February 2013 at 15:45

    No I was never sacked from the MEN. How did you find us by the way?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. scratching my head18 February 2013 at 18:45

      I am more interested how they managed to comment with a 'name,' thought they had to go through you with a request, or post as anonymous?

      Delete
    2. Unknown18 February 2013 at 19:34

      No you select Name/URL and don't enter a URL

      Delete
    3. Fluffsec18 February 2013 at 20:03

      The "like this" comment was me

      Delete
    4. scratching my head18 February 2013 at 20:47

      I guessed it wasn't me, cause the image/photo was wrong plus I didn't write it -at least I don't remember writing it

      Delete
    5. peter pann18 February 2013 at 20:50

      Are you sure?

      Delete
    6. scratching my head18 February 2013 at 20:53

      Stop it, this confusing

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)